|
Screenplay.com
Interview with Ted Tally
   
With each new film
screenwriter Ted Tally continues to push the line of excellence a notch
further into the realm of sheer genius. Ted received the Oscar for Best Screenplay
Adaptation after penning Silence of the Lambs. His latest film
All The Pretty Horses - directed by Oscar winner Billy Bob Thornton
and starring Oscar winner Matt Damon - has already been awarded Best Screenplay
by the prestigious National Board of Review.
In this exclusive
Screenplay.com interview, Ted Tally discusses his career as an award winning
screenwriter.
SSI: What
influences inspired you to become a screenwriter?
Ted: I actually
started out in the theatre, first in high school and summer theatres, then
in college and drama school, and finally as a professional playwright doing
Off-Broadway and regional theatre productions (and even a few productions
abroad.) I was always a big fan of movies, loved to see them, but it terms
of creativity, I didn't "dream" in movies, but rather in plays. I think this
was mostly because growing up so far from anywhere that movies were actually
being made (I was born and raised in N.C.), they just seemed part of a different,
impossibly distant, inaccessible culture - whereas I could be part of plays
in my own hometown.
So when I finally
was hired to write some screenplays, it was because people knew my theatre work,
and the theatre was still my frame of reference. An early influence in movies
was the great writer/director Robert Benton (Kramer Vs. Kramer, Places
in the Heart, etc.), with whom I had become friends in New York City, meeting
him through mutual acquaintances. He was a fellow southerner, fellow exile in
NYC, and I admired the enormous intelligence, sensitivity and craft of his work,
and aspired to be like him. I actually wrote the screenplay for The Silence
of the Lambs in an office space I borrowed from Benton.
SSI: How
did you learn the craft or perfect your talents as a screenwriter?
Ted: As
mentioned above, all my writing training came in the theatre. My experiences
working there with actors, directors, producers, designers, etc., especially
in rehearsals, and with getting a feel for audiences, rewriting after previews,
etc., proved to be invaluable when I switched over to full-time movie writing.
I never studied film or movie-writing in classes, workshops, books, etc.,
but I think such study could be very useful. However, nothing's ever as useful
as "hands-on" learning.
SSI: What
was your first big break?
Ted: In
the theatre, getting my MFA thesis play, Terra Nova, professionally produced
right out of drama school. In movies/TV, my first break was when a TV movie
on which I did rewrites ended up getting produced (for NBC), and I got a WGA
co-writing credit on it (The Father Clements Story, starring Lou Gossett,
Jr., Carroll O'Connor, and Malcolm Jamaal-Warner.) I guess that was about 1986-87.
Shortly thereafter I finally managed to get one of my feature scripts made,
White Palace. It had taken me about 7-8 years since I started writing
film and TV scripts to get something finally made.
SSI: What
unique qualities do you feel distinguish your writing from those of other screenwriters?
Ted: If
I have any particular distinction in this way (highly debatable), I feel it
might be that because of my particular background in the theatre, I have
a very practical, pragmatic, seat-of-the-pants sense of "what will play;" i.e., I try
to give the actors, designers, director, etc., the tools I know they will need
to put these scenes on their feet. Writing a script is never simply a "literary
exercise" to me: it' s practical craft. And I try to keep my eye focussed on
the overall production (the forest) rather than just my scenes and lines (the
trees.)
SSI: Are
there any particular challenges a writer faces when adapting previously written
material into a screenplay?
Ted: Sure,
but these vary greatly from project to project. They range from irate living
authors (mercifully rare, in my experience, but they exist), to weaknesses in
a book that need to be repaired, to general audience expectations (if a book
has been a huge public success, for instance, the screenwriter may feel the
need to make some changes just to re-surprise people who think they know the
story very well), and so forth.
Sometimes - the
best times - the only real problem is that the novel to be adapted presents
an embarrassment of riches, and the screenwriter's biggest headache is simply
deciding which of the too-many great scenes to try to keep in the script. (This
happened to me on Silence and also Pretty Horses.)
SSI: Is there
greater studio pressure to write scripts that matter more at the box office,
rather than scripts that tell a quality story?
Ted: I think
this pressure has pretty much always been there, throughout Hollywood history.
The problem, as William Goldman points out, is that "nobody knows anything."
Nobody can really predict what's going to be a hit, not with any consistent
degree of accuracy, or which small quality "sleeper" film is going to be the
next Full Monty and make a fortune. For the screenwriter I think what's
important is to leave that kind of headache-inducing thinking to the studio "suits," and
just concentrate on the job at hand. I try never to worry about the commercial
prospects of my scripts. (I'm getting paid to write them either way, so my
own commercial prospects are just fine, thank you.)
In the end, whatever
kind of writer you are (novelist, screenwriter, professional, amateur, etc.),
you can really only try to write that which moves and excites and pleases YOU,
and then hope some other people might turn out to share your taste.
SSI: What
type of characters and stories interest you?
Ted: All
kinds. I like wearing very different "hats" in terms of genres - love stories,
dramas, historical dramas, etc. Mission To Mars was a science fiction
movie, and All The Pretty Horses is a western. I really like trying new
things. But if I have any steady gig, I guess it would be thrillers. That's
a genre that allows so many different kinds of story routes and themes, and
a thriller usually provides the writer with a great narrative motor (which is
sometimes harder to locate in other kinds of stories.)
In terms of character,
I seem to be drawn to movies with strong women characters (I would find an all-male
story impossibly boring), elements of humor, if at all possible (most of my
theatre work was comic, though the few mainly comic screenplays I've attempted
haven't been produced), and I guess, in some indefinable way, I'm also drawn
to stories that brush up against my own biography, or that remind me strongly
of people I've known. And finally, I would say the single greatest trait that
draws me to a particular character is his or her courage.
SSI: What
elements attracted you most to All the Pretty Horses?
Ted: The
book is a masterpiece. It's a great "yarn" and unfolds with cinematic sweep
and narrative drive. I loved the southern/western characters and how they talk
and relate to one another. I loved how the book tackles some of literature's
greatest, most timeless themes, but always in the context of entertainment.
I loved the book's humor. I loved the setting, and the opportunity to do a
cowboy movie, which fulfilled childhood fantasies.
The director, stars,
etc., were all elements that came along later, years after the script was written;
I'm thrilled with them, but they weren't part of the initial attraction.
SSI: What
memorable experience can you recall while writing or being on the set of
All the Pretty Horses?
Ted: Writing
it was just writing it. Day after day at the computer for four or five months.
But every moment I was on the set, for a total of about two weeks (two separate
trips), was completely magical to me. I've been on other movie sets, of course,
but the extraordinary beauty and majesty and mystery of this setting (in New
Mexico) made it really special, almost dreamlike. Plus, Santa Fe, where the
movie was based, is one of my favorite towns.
Also, everyone
on the set was so great to spend time with; there was just such a warm, loving,
joshing "creative family" atmosphere. Matt Damon has said, "I wish I could make
this movie forever," and that really sums up how we all felt.
SSI: What
helpful advice can you offer to aspiring screenwriters?
Ted: Write.
Write and write and write. Don't just THINK about writing, don't talk out all
your best stuff to your friends, but actually apply the seat of the pants
to the chair and write it. Don't despair because you're pre-judging that "this
one will be hard to sell," don't stall over "maybe I need to do more research," etc.
- get something down on paper and worry about the details later. NO TIME SPENT
ACTUALLY WRITING IS EVER WASTED (even though what you're learning, the ways
in which your craft is growing, may not be immediately apparent.)
See every movie
you possibly can, trying to figure out what worked for you and what didn't,
and why. And finally, most importantly, write from your own heart. (I don't
say "from your own experience," because I think the power of imagination
is more important than any kind of strictly personal biography.)
And good luck to
one and all! Hope I'll see you at the movies.
- -Ted Tally
  
|