|
Writing
for an Actor and Why NOT to do it
A while ago we received an email from
a new writer asking an interesting question regarding how to break
in. The Email was sent to me to respond to as I have had some experience
with the "breaking
in" process. The folks here at Screenplay.com liked my advice and thought
that there might be other new writers out there who would find this
advice useful.
This writer had written a script with
a particular actor in mind. The writer wanted to know how to go about
getting the script to this actor. What I am about to explain is in
part fact, in some ways "conventional industry wisdom," and a little
personal experience. I have removed the actor's name, because it really
doesn't matter. The advice is the same regardless of the name you insert.
What follows is, for the most part, my response to this new writer:
First, it is generally considered a bad move to write
a role specifically for one person. The exception to this rule
is if the actor has committed to the project and the picture is "green
lighted." The reason for this is that (and this is the simple truth)
whomever your wrote the role for may never see the script, or if
they do may not share your opinion of the script and turn it down.
A script is always more marketable, and attractive to a producer
or director, if ANYBODY could play the part. Some producers may not
want to work with the actor you have in mind. Some may not like him
or her. Others may simply have another actor that they like to work
with. If your script can be filled with a variety of actors in any
of the roles you are much more likely to sell the script.
Secondly, the actor you have in mind is very marketable
right now. This means you must have an agent. An agent gives
you some legitimacy. Even if you have an agent, this actor's agent
may never pass the script on to the actor. The actor's agent isn't
going to take a risk on somebody without a track record. Again, this
is industry wisdom. But in my experience it has been the case.
Third, the actor you wrote this script for has (for
a few years) worked himself to a position whereby he can come up
with an idea, write it himself (sometimes with a writing partner)
and get it produced. This means the likelihood of this actor
working on a project that he didn't write is slim. And why should
he? He is getting paid to write the script himself (generally for
more than a million dollars) then he is getting paid to be one of
the producers (generally for a couple of million dollars) then he
gets his salary as an actor (I believe his last movie brought him
$15-$20 million - just for the acting). And since people flock to
his movies and the studios make tons of cash letting him do all this,
there seems little motivation for him to change this.
Let me give an example of a real world experience
a friend of mine had. This guy has been writing for a while and
has done very well for himself. He co-wrote a major blockbuster film
and was getting asked to write a number of projects. Well, there
happened to be a comic book character that a very big name action
star wanted to play. But there was a catch, twenty two if you will.
This actor would not commit to the project until he had seen a script.
But, no producer would pay a writer to do the script unless the actor
would commit to the project.
So in steps my friend's agent. Proving that a good agent
will find a good writer work where there may be none, his agent got
both parties to agree to let my friend write the script. My friend
and the actor had worked together on a project before so he felt comfortable
saying that he would be more likely to commit if my friend wrote the
script.
So, the script is written and the producer who had agreed
to pay my friend decided when it was all done to give it to another
actor that he preferred to work with. This actor too was a big-time
action star, but had a very different action charisma and personality.
Since from the beginning it was understood that the first actor was
going to play the lead, it was written for him with his personality
in mind. Needless to say there were some major rewrites to tailor it
to the star who did commit.
So the lesson here is even if it seems like an actor
is going to play a part it may not be the best idea to write a part
specifically for that actor. It may not, in the end, be played by that
actor. It will create a lot of work for you the writer in the long
run. Besides, if the actor has even the slightest ability, he or she
will be able to make the part their own in any case.
I hope this helps. And keep in mind,
all of this is just advice. As that writer friend of mine once told
me "it's only worth
what you paid." But the best advice I can give is keep writing.
Jason
M. Eng is an Advertising Coordinator for Screenplay Systems, Inc.
and a regular contributor to the Scoop, the monthly newsletter of
Screenplay.com. He has written over fifteen scripts, two of them
having been optioned. He is currently developing a film for independent
production.
(Back
to Articles)
|